Telepresence robots are deputising for their human controllers in the workplace, but can they really fit in?
YOU wander around the office, stopping off in the kitchen to chat with colleagues before heading down the hallway to an impromptu design meeting. Afterwards, you head to a colleague’s office to continue the discussion.
It is a fairly typical day at work – except that you are in London, while all the people you have been talking to are in your company’s New York office. You have, in effect, beamed yourself across the Atlantic in the guise of a telepresence robot.
These robots are essentially a video camera, speaker and screen on wheels, and they can be controlled from anywhere in the world using a web browser. They allow managers to keep an eye on their factories overseas and multinational teams to collaborate on projects – all without setting foot on a plane.
As the robots begin to appear in more and more offices and factories, they are poised to transform the way we work and interact with our colleagues. For one thing, the robots’ mobility lets people in remote locations talk to colleagues without resorting to the videoconference facilities of the meeting room, says Leila Takayama of Willow Garage, a robotics company in Menlo Park, California. “Telepresence is really for informal communications, for the gatherings that happen before and after the big meetings, where real decisions are made and real team-building gets done,” she says.
Another California-based firm, Anybots, recently began selling its QB telepresence robot as an alternative to conventional videoconferencing systems. Similar robots are marketed by VGo Communications in Nashua, New Hampshire, whose clients include hospitals and universities. Teenager Lyndon Baty from Knox City in Texas, who suffers from polycystic kidney disease, manages to attend classes at his school using a VGo robot.
At Google, Johnny Chung
Lee has built his own telepresent robot so that he can interact with his fiancée when they are apart. Lee, who previously helped develop the Kinect gaming system while at Microsoft, used off-the-shelf components for the robot and wrote a simple application to control it from a built-in laptop.
But can these robots blur the lines between human and machine? In a research project to be presented in May at a human-computer interaction conference in Vancouver, Canada, Takayama and Min Kyung Lee at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, monitored workers at three companies who were using Willow Garage’s prototype Texai telepresence system.
They found that remote workers using the robots were interacting with colleagues as if they were all physically together. They used the bots to attend meetings and informal gatherings in the office kitchen or games room. What’s more, people liked interacting with the robots.
“One participant who worked remotely said he had previously felt very invisible, as no one showed an interest in interacting with him,” says Lee. “But once he started using the robot, everyone wanted to talk to him.”
Remote workers can feel a closer connection to their office colleagues than is possible with emails or phone calls, says Katherine Tsui of the University of Massachusetts Lowell, who has also been studying the impact telepresence robots have in the workplace.
“Overall we found that in more ad-hoc situations, and for people who wanted to be closer to their teams, telepresence robots did provide benefits,” she says. “They help to foster a closer connection.”